Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Arum maculatum L. is a traditionally consumed but toxic and irritant plant that must be processed before use. This exploratory study examined whether three preparations—an ethanol:water (80:20, v/v) extract of dried material (E1), a corresponding extract of fresh material (E2) and an aqueous decoction of fresh material (E3) mirroring traditional boiling—differ in apparent α-amylase inhibition, and whether their previously reported phenolic marker profiles (high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection, HPLC–PDA) account for these differences. Inhibition of Aspergillus oryzae α-amylase was measured by the starch–iodine method at a single extract concentration and two enzyme loadings, using one extract per preparation and analytical triplicates. All extracts gave higher apparent inhibition values (75.13–90.80%) than the assay-internal acarbose control (67.28–68.15%) at the same nominal mass concentration (40 µg/mL), with E3 highest at the higher enzyme loading. The previously quantified markers did not account for this pattern. Docking against fungal (3VX0, 7TAA) and human (2QV4, 4GQR) α-amylases placed all markers in the catalytic cleft, a hypothesis-generating result that does not establish binding affinity. These descriptive differences indicate that processing is associated with different apparent α-amylase inhibition, whereas the active constituents, possible assay interference and the safety of the preparations remain to be established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özdemir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: