Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Landing-gear components are subjected to repeated impact, taxiing, braking, and ground-maneuver loads, making reliable crack-growth assessment essential for safe operation. This study develops an experiment-informed computational framework for predicting the crack-propagation life of Ti-6Al-4V components. Compact-tension tests conducted in accordance with ASTM E647-24 were used to determine the Paris-law parameters and characterize the fracture-surface morphology. A three-dimensional crack-growth model incorporating local crack-tip refinement and an equivalent surface residual-stress field was validated against measured crack-length histories. The finite-element model achieved an overall RMSE of 0.779 mm, MAE of 0.576 mm, R 2 of 0.965, and MAPE of 1.93%. One hundred Latin hypercube samples were then used to train a Kriging surrogate that maps seven inputs—the Paris constants, load ratio, maximum load, residual stress, initial crack length, and crack extension—to the scalar accumulated cycle count. Within the stable crack-growth regime, the surrogate yielded an RMSE of 1.30 × 10 4 cycles, MAE of 1.10 × 10 4 cycles, R 2 of 0.969, and MAPE of 8.75%. Sensitivity analysis identified the initial crack length, applied load, and stress ratio as the dominant variables, with normalized contributions of 55.4%, 35.7%, and 8.9%, respectively. The framework enables rapid, uncertainty-aware screening of crack-growth life under loading conditions relevant to aircraft landing gear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: