Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the consistency and reliability of GNSS receiver antenna type-mean phase center corrections by analyzing both individual and type-mean Phase Center Correction (PCC) models. Using data from approximately 70 geodetic-grade antennas within the Polish ASG-EUPOS network, we quantify variations in calibration models across multiple GNSS signals. Differences between individual and type-mean calibrations are assessed in both the pattern and position domains. The analysis reveals signal-specific discrepancies, particularly for GPS L2 (G02), where deviations reach up to 5 mm in dPCC RMS and 30 mm in MAX values, impacting ionosphere-free (IF) linear-combinations. Position-domain validation via Precise Point Positioning further demonstrates vertical offsets exceeding 5 mm due to outdated or incomplete PCC models, with systematic biases arising from cross-system substitutions, e.g., GPS corrections used for GALILEO signals. The findings emphasize the need for consistent, up-to-date calibration models, and propose robust, signal-specific metrics to support the reliable use of GNSS data in regional and global reference frames.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krzan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: