Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cotton farming faces persistent yield losses from leaf diseases that can be reduced significantly through early automated detection. While convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approaches have demonstrated benchmark accuracies exceeding 95%, translating those results into practical tools for rural farmers remains challenging. This review analyses 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2025, retrieved from IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Elsevier ScienceDirect. Four methodological directions are evaluated: transfer learning, lightweight CNN architectures, ensemble and hybrid methods and super-resolution (SR) Pre-processing. Transfer learning backbones such as VGG16 achieve up to 98.1% accuracy but carry model sizes exceeding 500 MB that are incompatible with budget Android hardware. Lightweight architectures notably MobileNetV3-Small (9.4 MB, ~95 ms CPU inference) and EfficientNet-Lite0 (15.6 MB, ~120 ms), substantially reduce computational cost but degrade under low-quality field images. SR Pre-processing improves classification accuracy by 5–10% on degraded inputs, yet the combined SR-classifier pipeline has not been validated on real mobile devices. Three critical gaps are identified and prioritised: the absence of geographically representative, field-collected cotton leaf datasets from Indian growing regions; the lack of end-to-end pipelines that jointly optimise lightweight SR with mobile-ready classifiers; and the near-complete absence of on-device evaluation under authentic agricultural conditions. Pairing MobileNetV3 or EfficientNet-Lite with an efficient SR stage and deploying via TensorFlow Lite represents the most technically credible near-term path to a tool that smallholder farmers can genuinely use. Future experimental validation of this pipeline on real-device hardware with field-collected cotton images is explicitly identified as the primary recommended next step, directly addressing the predictive nature of this review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: