Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sustainable procurement in Saudi Arabia has become a practical mechanism for linking industrial competitiveness, domestic value creation and responsible supply-chain performance. This structured narrative review examines how purchasing governance, supplier development, local content measurement and sustainability criteria can be combined within energy and infrastructure supply chains under Vision 2030. Drawing on public policy documents, institutional reports and relevant procurement research published principally during 2020–2025, it distinguishes localization outcomes from purchasing preferences and considers their operational trade-offs. The review identifies five interacting dimensions: transparent sourcing, supplier capability, lifecycle value, responsible production and measurable domestic economic contribution. It proposes a staged framework linking demand forecasting and supplier qualification to collaborative capability building, contract execution, independent measurement and continuous improvement. Evidence from Saudi Arabia’s industrial-development initiatives and Aramco’s In-Kingdom Total Value Add program indicates the strategic importance of domestic manufacturing, technical skills, innovation and supplier diversification. However, local purchasing alone does not demonstrate sustainability or resilience; firms must also assess delivery reliability, labor safeguards, environmental performance, competitiveness and the quality of local value creation. The article develops an implementation scorecard and research agenda for evaluating localization without sacrificing project schedule, safety or public value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olawale Bishi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: