Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Political extremism and polarisation are self-evidently detrimental to democracy in a general sense, but little is known about the effects of these forces at the micro level, such as their potential to reduce how engaged new and would-be citizens are in politics. We address this knowledge gap by focusing on the experience of Korean migrants in Australia, a notionally multicultural and inclusive democracy where nearly one-third of the population is overseas-born, at a time of heightened political polarisation and social discord. In the first half of the 2020s, we argue, migrants themselves became inadvertently embroiled in a host of contentious issues in Australia, such as responses to the Covid-19 pandemic, trust in electoral processes and public institutions, mis-/dis-information, and social cohesion. To explore the degree to which Korean Australians engaged in politics in these conditions of polarisation, this article analyses original data collected from a study of political engagement among Koreans in Australia, as well as reports in the local Korean-language media. The article finds that rather than Korean Australians being disengaged from politics, they are disempowered : they lack the capacity to engage with it as extensively as they would prefer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hundt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: