Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A geometric scene may admit many coordinate descriptions, primitive parameterizations, and construction histories. These freedoms obstruct direct alignment of geometry with engineering meaning: the transverse frame of an unmarked cylinder is invisible to its solid, while an attached port or child may depend on that frame. We develop a hierarchical method that anchors a local chart to a candidate parent, compensates every dependent quantity under chart changes, extracts frame-independent typed relations, and matches complete local patterns across scenes. A business interpretation is valid precisely when the intended business state is constant on the fibers of the extracted relation; otherwise the method must retain candidates or abstain. We connect this criterion to an evidencepreserving PHG-style construction tree and a CCS-based geometric layer, while separating canonical representation of a selected state from recognition from reduced observations. Lean 4 verifies the gauge-equivalence and hierarchical compensation laws, the relationto-business factorization criterion, a restricted constructive normalization example, and an exact axis-aligned planar rod-pair profile. In 139 native-mesh Blender scenes from a plant demonstration, 3,347 route meshes yield 854 axial box candidates and 524 resolved near-pair motifs. Twelve coarse motif keys recur across scenes; 437 planar pairs are imported into Lean and all pass the declared extraction checks. These are geometric motif results, not certified pipe connections or business-role accuracy. The contribution is a precise criterion and executable research path for reference-independent local semantics, with explicit conditions under which objective geometric relations can support engineering interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guojun Pan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: