Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The digital transformation of agriculture has created cyber-physical systems in which biological processes are monitored and adjusted through sensory, digital, and visualpipelines. As these systems increasingly rely on artificial intelligence, controlled agriculture environments use biological inputs such as leaf images for disease detection and yield estimation; amongst other goals. Images used as input for on-the-farm decision making are frequently exposed to adversarial manipulation and to synthetic images created by new generative models. Prior studies in this domain focused mainly on pixel-level attacks or simple binary detection and offered limited support for identifying the generative source of an image and for handling unseen generators. In this work, we propose a unified detection and attribution framework for agricultural cyber-physical systems (namely: AgriVision). Synthetic concealment and fabrication attack scenarios are created using multiple generative adversarial networks (StyleGAN2, StyleGAN3, R3GAN) and diffusion models (Instruct-Pix2Pix, BLIP-Diffusion, DreamShaper-8) across apple, maize, and tomato imagery. These synthetic samples are used to evaluate three vision classifier architectures: EfficientNet-B0, ResNet-50, and CLIP (ViT-B/32), for binary authenticity classification (Real vs. Synthetic), source identification (Real, GAN, or Diffusion), and detailed plant-health-source attribution. In the in-distribution setting, the convolutional models reach near-saturated performance for the generators and preprocessing conditions present in training, while CLIP performs well on detailed attribution but shows weaker performance on binary authenticity classification. When the models are evaluated on images from generators not seen during training, accuracy drops for source attribution and CLIP shows plant-specific failures. These results demonstrate both the promise and the limits of current generative-image detection methods in controlled agricultural imagery and motivate layered, continuously updated defenses for preserving the integrity of automated agricultural monitoring pipelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yardımcı et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: