Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Load frequency control (LFC) is essential for maintaining frequency stability and regulating tie-line power in interconnected power systems. Conventional fixed-order PI and PID controllers offer limited tuning flexibility for complex multi-area systems, whereas fractional-order controllers provide additional tuning parameters at the cost of increased optimization complexity. Furthermore, the performance of optimization-based LFC schemes depends strongly on the selected objective function, as conventional integral criteria, such as the integral of time-weighted absolute error (ITAE), may not adequately distinguish between candidate responses with different error magnitudes and persistence. To address this research gap, this study investigates an exponential time-weighted cost function, termed the integral exponential time-weighted error saturation (IEMTES) criterion. Its principal contribution is the exponential transformation of the time-weighted error before integration. This preserves an ITAE-related first-order contribution while introducing higher-order nonlinear error terms; a saturation mechanism limits the exponential argument. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of IEMTES, in combination with the Glider Snake Optimizer (GSO), for tuning four controller structures: PI, PID, FOPID, and FOIID. Two benchmark systems are considered: a two-area non-reheat thermal system and a three-area thermal–thermal–hydro system incorporating generation rate constraints (GRCs). For the investigated GSO–FOIID configuration in the three-area system, the ITAE decreases from 76.20 with ITAE-based optimization to 69.69 with IEMTES-based optimization, corresponding to an improvement of approximately 8.5%. Additional evaluations consider random step-load patterns, larger load perturbations, and parameter variations. The findings are limited to the investigated systems, controller structures, disturbances, parameter ranges, and optimization settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismaeel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: