Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Healthcare systems increasingly attempt to personalize risk communication by matching messages to patients' decision-making styles. This approach is resource intensive, yet evidence that it improves patient experience or decision quality remains limited. Methods: We conducted a cross-cultural experimental study with adults from the UK (n=330, recruited via Prolific) and Singapore (n=220, recruited via professional networks). Participants viewed three healthcare scenarios with risks of 1%, 10%, and 20%, presented in either positive (``99% no complications'') or negative (``1% complications'') frames displayed side-by-side in randomized order. Decision-making styles were assessed using the Control Preferences Scale, categorizing participants as information-seeking, shared decision-making, or paternalistic. The primary outcome was likelihood of accepting the proposed option; secondary outcomes were perceived framing helpfulness and decision satisfaction. Results: Among 550 participants who completed all measures, decision-making style did not predict framing preferences at any risk level or in either country (all p>.05). Risk magnitude strongly shaped preferences. Positive framing was preferred at 1% risk (50.0%, p<.001), declined at 10% risk (43.5%, p=.002), and showed no advantage at 20% risk, where preferences were evenly split. Age predicted decision-making style, with older adults favouring physician-directed care (p=.004). UK participants reported higher willingness to proceed with interventions, although this pattern may reflect sampling differences rather than systematic cultural variation. Decision satisfaction did not differ by style or framing. Conclusions: Decision-making styles did not guide framing preferences, suggesting limited value in style-based personalization. Risk-responsive, universally clear communication strategies may more effectively enhance comprehension, trust, and satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victoria Sze Min Ekstrom (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: