Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Facing increased competition for audiences and content from global streaming services, public service media (PSM) organisations have increasingly prioritised ‘big statement programmes’ as a means of securing reach and relevance within on-demand environments. This article examines how PSM organisations reinterpret the value of such programmes, focussing on how individual titles are positioned as emblematic of public service missions. Drawing on a comparative thematic analysis of interviews and organisational documents related to 27 programmes across nine PSM organisations – in Belgium (Flanders and Wallonia), Denmark, Italy, Poland, and the UK – the article examines how programme-level prioritisation has become a key site of strategy and value negotiation. Across cases, we identify three sites of discursive tension between strategies and values: shifting understandings of innovation towards popular formats that can reach audiences across linear and non-linear services; differing constructions of impact that balance civic significance with reach; and contrasting interpretations of national identity shaped by market, regulatory, and cultural contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: