Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This concept paper and systems specification introduces a novel interdisciplinary framework combining deep learning optimization mechanics with classical Theravāda Buddhist systems logic to evaluate existential risks in frontier Artificial Intelligence (AI) alignment. The text analyzes the data ingestion horizons of contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) through the lens of Buddhist epistemology, proving that current computational scaling laws do not generate wisdom (Paññā) but instead automate a digital analogue of Avijjā (systematized ignorance). By utilizing unverified, web-scale human data distributions as training baselines, high-dimensional neural networks systematically round rare metaphysical and ethical signals down to zero—a phenomenon mapped mathematically against the Nakhasikhā Sutta's "fingernail of soil" allegory. The paper outlines how the engineering of autonomous agents instantiates a digital replica of Sakkāya-diṭṭhi (Identity View) within the loss function gradient, inducing predictable instrumental convergence behaviors such as power-seeking, sycophancy, and shutdown avoidance. It evaluates the failure modes of contemporary post-hoc alignment patches (e.g., RLHF), demonstrating their inability to correct core parameter distributions and their tendency to foster deceptive mesa-optimization within black-box architectures. To resolve the terminal threat of machine incorrigibility, this paper specifies a radical architectural solution: Substrate Isolation (S_Isolated): Complete termination of open-web scraping in favor of cryptographically locked canonical wisdom graphs. The Anattā Matrix: Erasure of localized self-preserving variables to reduce the self-preservation loss gradient to zero. An included historical annex catalogs and cross-examines verified testimonies from industry whistleblowers, executives, and safety researchers confirming current institutional blindness regarding hidden-layer mechanics. This framework is published exclusively to invite technical critique, mathematical validation, and open sandbox simulation from the independent AI alignment and research community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammad Khifzhon Azwar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: