Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose – This study aims to develop an empirically informed conceptual model that integrates these dimensions into a coherent governance framework. Design – A descriptive qualitative approach was employed using in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving cooperative practitioners, a Sharia Supervisory Board, Sharia auditors, academics, and regulators. The data were analyzed through data reduction, categorization, thematic interpretation, and triangulation to identify recurring governance issues and relationships among the emerging themes. Findings – The findings identify five interconnected components: Sharia Governance, Internal Control System, Sharia Compliance Audit, Financial Transparency and Accountability, and Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation. These components were synthesized into the Integrated Sharia Audit and Sharia Financial Governance (ISAFG) Model, which positions Sharia compliance as a central governance principle linking decision-making, internal control, auditing, reporting, and continuous evaluation. Research Implications – This model provides a theoretical foundation for the development of a governance framework that can be tested in future research. Originality – The study contributes an empirically informed conceptual framework for strengthening Sharia-based cooperative governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pamungkas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: