Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, the Anderson-type heptamolybdate [Mo7O24]6- ion has been used as an inorganic ligand to protect various metal oxy-hydroxides (FeOOH and NixFe1-xOOH) and oxides (SnO2 and CeO2), and these unique varieties of materials are employed as electrode materials for water oxidation and nitrate reduction. Herein, [Mo7O24]6- covalently connected to a SnO2 nanocore, namely Mox@SnO2, is prepared through a hydrothermal route and has been fabricated on a 1 cm2 surface of a conducting carbon support to study proton conduction and electrocatalytic proton reduction. The Mox@SnO2 fabricated carbon cloth (CC) exhibits the maximum proton conductivity of 15.34 × 10−3 S cm-1 at pH 3.65 and room temperature, which increased linearly with the increment in cell temperature and reached 32.47 × 10−3 S cm−1 at 318 K. Under similar conditions, the bare SnO2 fabricated on CC shows relatively low proton conductivity, highlighting the importance of POM ligands on Mox@SnO2 to facilitate proton conduction with an extremely low activation energy of 0.13 eV, indicative of proton shuttling through the Grotthuss pathway. Further, the facile proton conduction on Mox@SnO2 and the redox participation of POMs, as depicted from cyclic voltammetric studies, enable electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) under mild acidic conditions, delivering an onset potential of -0.4 V vs RHE and a nearly two-fold higher catalytic current at -0.9 V compared to that observed for SnO2. The electrokinetic study has confirmed that the improved performance of Mox@SnO2 over SnO2 is due to enhanced charge-transfer kinetics. This study showcases a new role for covalently attached heptamolybdate anions on SnO2, facilitating proton relay and reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mallick et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: