Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Determination of heavy metals, trace elements and rare earth elements (REEs) in sediments, soils, plants, molluscs, fish, water, aerosols and related environmental matrices is a foundation for pollution assessment, food safety, biomonitoring, geochemical tracing and human-health risk evaluation. From 2000 to 2026, the analytical field has moved from single-element determinations by flame atomic absorption spectrometry toward high-throughput multi-element methods, field screening, element speciation and data-driven interpretation. This review synthesizes journal papers, standard methods and reference-material guidance on sample preparation and elemental measurement in environmental and biological samples. The methods reviewed include flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, hydride-generation and cold-vapour atomic spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, tandem and high-resolution ICP-MS, X-ray fluorescence including portable and total-reflection systems, instrumental neutron activation analysis, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, anodic stripping voltammetry, direct mercury analysis and chromatographic speciation methods coupled to element-selective detection. For each technique, the paper compares suitable matrices, equipment, detection capability, advantages, disadvantages, quality-control requirements, certified reference materials, and operational constraints. The review emphasizes that validated concentration data require matrix-matched certified reference materials, blanks, duplicates, spike recovery, calibration verification, detection-limit reporting and uncertainty evaluation. Finally, the paper summarizes how elemental concentration data can be transformed into pollution indices, sediment-quality guideline quotients, bioaccumulation and translocation factors, source-apportionment models, REE-normalized patterns, geospatial maps, ecological risk and non-carcinogenic or carcinogenic human-health risk metrics. A tiered method-selection and interpretation framework is proposed for environmental laboratories and researchers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: