Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Motion capture archives preserve joint-level trajectories, but their reuse remains difficult when the target collection has few labeled examples. We study cross-domain transfer in a low-label regime in which 1%, 5%, 10%, or 25% of target-domain motif annotations are available, while the 100% condition is retained only as a fully supervised reference. HMT-DP, a self-supervised Hierarchical Motion Tokenizer for Digital Preservation, combines a part-aware graph transformer with masked motion reconstruction, kinematic consistency, view-invariant contrastive learning, and balanced prototype assignment. Frame-, motif-, and phrase-level tokens represent distinct semantic scales within fixed-duration input windows, and every token is linked to its source dataset, sequence, view, and temporal interval. With 100% target labels, HMT-DP achieved 89.1 ± 0.5% macro-F1 and 70.4 ± 0.6% cross-view mean average precision. In the low-label regime, macro-F1 was 42.6 ± 2.0%, 57.9 ± 1.3%, 66.8 ± 0.9%, and 78.4 ± 0.7% at 1%, 5%, 10%, and 25% labels, respectively. Under 20% random joint masking, HMT-DP achieved 84.6 ± 0.6%. Motif tokens provided 16-fold motion stream compression with a mean per joint position error of 45.8 ± 0.8 mm; complete repository accounting yielded an effective 3.1-fold reduction after codebooks, descriptors, provenance records, and the retrieval index were included. A manually segmented boundary subset yielded a tolerance-based boundary F1 of 79.8 ± 1.1%. Within the YNU-Dance Mongolian case study protocol, HMT-DP therefore provides a compact, searchable representation whose retrieval results remain linked to the recorded source intervals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: