Key result
Higher plasma BNP is linked to ~2.4-fold higher levels in symptomatic vs asymptomatic mitral regurgitation.
Why the study?
A biochemical test that assists in grading the severity of mitral regurgitation and interpreting symptoms would be of clinical value, prompting this evaluation of associations between plasma natriuretic peptide levels and mitral regurgitation severity and symptoms.
Does measurement of plasma natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP, N-BNP) correlate with symptom status and disease severity in patients with isolated mitral regurgitation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction?
Cross-Sectional (n=149)
Does measurement of plasma natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP, N-BNP) correlate with symptom status and disease severity in patients with isolated mitral regurgitation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction?
Plasma natriuretic peptide levels (ANP, BNP, and N-BNP) increase with the severity of mitral regurgitation and accurately distinguish symptomatic from asymptomatic patients even when left ventricular ejection fraction is preserved.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid noninvasive mitral regurgitation assessment; leaves open prospective validation for risk stratification or intervention timing.
Objectives This paper will describe associations between plasma natriuretic peptide levels and the severity and symptoms of mitral regurgitation (MR). Background A biochemical test that assisted grading of the severity of MR and the interpretation of symptoms would be of clinical value. Methods Forty-nine patients with isolated MR and left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions (EFs) of >55% underwent transthoracic echocardiography, assessment of symptoms, and measurement of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and its amino-terminal portion, N-BNP. Results The level of each natriuretic peptide rose with increasing severity of MR and with increases in left atrial (LA) dimensions (p < 0.001 for all comparisons), but no significant correlation existed between any natriuretic peptide and the LV dimensions or EF. Natriuretic peptide levels were higher in symptomatic MR (n = 16, BNP geometric mean 16.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.3 to 21.4] pmol/l) compared with asymptomatic MR (n = 33, BNP 7.1 [95% CI 6.0 to 8.4] pmol/l, p < 0.001), and higher in asymptomatic MR than in normal controls (n = 100, BNP 5.3 [95% CI 4.8 to 5.8] pmol/l, p < 0.0001). These differences were similar for N-BNP and ANP and remained statistically significant (p < 0.05) after adjustment for echocardiographic measures of LV function and severity of MR. Both the sensitivity and the specificity for symptoms for the natriuretic peptides (area under receiver-operator characteristic curve for BNP = 0.90, N-BNP = 0.89, ANP = 0.89) were similar to the MR score (0.88) and greater than for LA dimension (0.81), vena contracta width (0.82), and LV end-systolic dimension (0.63). Conclusions Plasma natriuretic peptides levels increase with the severity of MR and are higher in symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients, even when LV EF is normal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sutton et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Mitral regurgitation (n=149). Plasma natriuretic peptide levels (ANP, BNP, N-BNP) vs. Asymptomatic mitral regurgitation and normal controls was evaluated on Plasma BNP level (pmol/l) in symptomatic vs asymptomatic mitral regurgitation (p=<0.001). Plasma BNP levels were significantly higher in symptomatic vs asymptomatic mitral regurgitation (16.9 vs 7.1 pmol/l, p<0.001) and rose with MR severity (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: