Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We aim to better characterize Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients with suspected non-Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) pathology (SNAP) based on their longitudinal outcome, cognition, biofluid and neuroimaging profile. MCI participants (n=361) from ADNI-GO/2 were designated ‘amyloid positive’ with abnormal Aβ42 levels (AMY+) and ‘neurodegeneration positive’ (NEU+) with abnormal hippocampal volume or hypometabolism using FDG-PET. SNAP was compared with the other MCI groups and with AMY− controls. AMY−NEU+/SNAP, 16.6%, were older than the NEU− groups, but not AMY− controls. They had a lower conversion rate to AD after 24 months than AMY+NEU+ MCI participants. SNAP MCI participants had similar Aβ42 levels, florbetapir and tau levels, but larger white matter hyperintensity volumes than AMY− controls and AMY−NEU− MCI participants. SNAP participants performed worse on all memory domains and on other cognitive domains, than AMY−NEU− participants, but less so than AMY+NEU+ participants. Subthreshold levels of cerebral amyloidosis are unlikely to play a role in SNAP MCI, but pathologies involving the hippocampus and cerebrovascular disease may underlie the neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment in this group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wisse et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: