Key result
Renal denervation is linked to ~10-ms lower P-wave dispersion and improved repolarization markers at 6 months.
Why the study?
Although renal sympathetic denervation is an emerging device-based therapy for resistant hypertension, its effects on ECG markers related to arrhythmic risk remain incompletely defined.
Does renal sympathetic denervation improve electrocardiographic markers of arrhythmic risk (P-wave dispersion, Tp-Te interval, frontal QRS-T angle) compared to medical therapy in patients with resistant hypertension?
Cohort (n=263)
Does renal sympathetic denervation improve electrocardiographic markers of arrhythmic risk (P-wave dispersion, Tp-Te interval, frontal QRS-T angle) compared to medical therapy in patients with resistant hypertension?
Renal sympathetic denervation in resistant hypertension is associated with favorable reductions in ECG markers of atrial and ventricular electrical heterogeneity at 6 months independent of office SBP changes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RDN-linked ECG changes in resistant hypertension merit randomized trials; leaves open translation to fewer clinical arrhythmias.
OBJECTIVE: Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has emerged as a device-based therapy for resistant hypertension; however, its effects on electrocardiographic (ECG) markers related to arrhythmic risk remain incompletely defined. We aimed to evaluate changes in ECG indices reflecting atrial and ventricular electrical heterogeneity in patients undergoing RDN compared to medically treated controls. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 263 patients with resistant hypertension (RDN+, n = 120; RDN-, n = 143) with baseline and 6-month ECG recordings. ECG parameters included the P-wave dispersion, Tp-Te interval, and frontal QRS-T angle. To account for baseline differences, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW) based on propensity scores was applied. Weighted linear regression models with doubly robust adjustment were used to estimate the independent association between RDN and follow-up ECG parameters after adjusting for baseline ECG values and change in SBP. RESULTS: At 6 months, patients undergoing RDN demonstrated significantly lower P-wave dispersion (27.4 vs. 37.5 ms, P < 0.001), Tp-Te interval (80.3 vs. 84.7 ms, P = 0.028), and frontal QRS-T angle (26 vs. 37°, P = 0.026) compared with controls. In the weighted models, RDN remained independently associated with reductions in these parameters. CONCLUSION: In patients with resistant hypertension, renal sympathetic denervation was associated with improvements in ECG markers related to arrhythmic risk at 6 months, which were not fully explained by changes in office SBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keten et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in resistant hypertension (n=263). Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) vs. Medically treated controls (RDN-) was evaluated on P-wave dispersion, Tp-Te interval, and frontal QRS-T angle at 6 months (p=< 0.001). Renal sympathetic denervation was associated with lower P-wave dispersion (27.4 vs 37.5 ms, P<0.001), Tp-Te interval (80.3 vs 84.7 ms, P=0.028), and QRS-T angle (26 vs 37°, P=0.026) at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: