Key result
VELA-based chimney EVAR achieves ~95% successful sac exclusion in juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Why the study?
Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms have a short infrarenal neck that precludes standard EVAR, and persistent type Ia endoleak is a principal limitation of chimney EVAR. This study examined whether the AFX VELA cuff extension reduces type Ia endoleak through passive sealing.
Does chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ChEVAR) using the AFX VELA cuff extension reduce type Ia endoleak and gutter leakage compared to Endurant II and Excluder C3 in juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Cohort (n=20)
No
Does chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ChEVAR) using the AFX VELA cuff extension reduce type Ia endoleak and gutter leakage compared to Endurant II and Excluder C3 in juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
VELA-based chimney EVAR demonstrates low gutter leakage in vitro and a 95% clinical sac exclusion rate without persistent type Ia endoleaks over 36.5 months, supporting its feasibility for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms when fenestrated EVAR is unavailable.
PURPOSE: Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAAs) present with a short infrarenal neck that does not permit standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The AFX VELA cuff extension with its endoskeletal architecture may reduce type Ia endoleak (TIaEL) through passive sealing. We examined this hypothesis using a double-chimney benchtop model and a clinical cohort treated with VELA-based chimney EVAR (ChEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A benchtop model compared gutter leakage volumes among VELA, Endurant II and Excluder C3 (5 trials per device). A retrospective single-centre cohort (January 2018-April 2024) included consecutive JAAA patients undergoing VELA-based ChEVAR with ≥12-month follow-up. Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) morphometry compared seal-zone geometry across the 3 platforms. RESULTS: In the benchtop model, VELA showed a median gutter leakage of 5.0 mL/min (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0-11.0), whereas both comparators exceeded 500 mL/min and were right-censored. In the clinical cohort, 20 patients (55% male; median age 80.0 years) underwent ChEVAR for JAAAs with a median diameter of 53.5 mm and infrarenal neck length of 5.0 mm. Clinically successful sac exclusion was achieved in 19 of 20 patients (95%). Intraoperative TIaEL occurred in 5 patients: 1 major endoleak was sealed with adjunctive gutter coil embolisation, and 4 minor endoleaks resolved spontaneously on the 1-month CT angiogram. Over a median follow-up of 36.5 months, no persistent TIaEL was detected on follow-up imaging, and no chimney stent-graft (SG) occlusion occurred. One patient (5%) required an aortic-related reintervention for a type Ib endoleak. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased by ≥20% in 9 patients (45%), and 1 started dialysis at 4 years. On postoperative CT morphometry, relative gutter area was lowest with VELA, intermediate with Endurant II and highest with Excluder C3; circumferential apposition followed the inverse pattern. CONCLUSION: In the benchtop model, VELA produced consistently lower leakage than both comparators, with concordant CT morphometric evidence consistent with a passive sealing mechanism. In this cohort, VELA-based ChEVAR achieved clinically successful sac exclusion in 19 of 20 patients (95%) with no persistent TIaEL and no chimney SG occlusion. These findings support the feasibility of VELA-based ChEVAR when FEVAR is unavailable; multicentre prospective validation is required. CLINICAL IMPACT: Persistent type Ia endoleak (TIaEL) is a principal limitation of chimney EVAR (ChEVAR) compared with fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR). We report short-to mid-term outcomes of ChEVAR using the AFX VELA cuff extension, whose endoskeletal architecture is designed to promote passive sealing. Postoperative CT morphometry comparing the 3 devices (VELA, Endurant II and Excluder C3) showed a smaller relative gutter area and higher circumferential apposition with VELA, paralleling the benchtop pattern. VELA-based ChEVAR achieved clinically successful sac exclusion in 19 of 20 patients (95%), without persistent TIaEL detected on follow-up imaging. VELA-based ChEVAR appears feasible when FEVAR is unavailable; however, multicentre validation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneko et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA) (n=20). AFX VELA cuff extension-based chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ChEVAR) vs. Endurant II and Excluder C3 (in benchtop model and CT morphometry) was evaluated on Clinically successful sac exclusion without persistent type Ia endoleak (TIaEL). VELA-based chimney EVAR achieved clinically successful sac exclusion in 95% (19/20) of JAAA patients with 0% persistent type Ia endoleak over 36.5 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: