Key result
Intra-arterial tenecteplase during thrombectomy fails to improve 90-day functional outcomes over thrombectomy alone.
Why the study?
Intra-arterial tenecteplase during endovascular treatment may increase first-pass recanalization and dissolve microcirculatory thrombi in acute ischemic stroke, but its efficacy and safety were uncertain.
Does adjunctive intra-arterial tenecteplase administered during endovascular thrombectomy improve 90-day favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) compared to thrombectomy alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion?
RCT (n=380)
Open-label, blinded-endpoint
1:1 simple randomization via central web-based program
Yes
Does adjunctive intra-arterial tenecteplase administered during endovascular thrombectomy improve 90-day favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) compared to thrombectomy alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion?
Adjunctive intra-arterial tenecteplase administered during endovascular thrombectomy for acute large-vessel occlusion ischemic stroke did not improve 90-day functional outcomes compared with thrombectomy alone and was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support adjunct intra-arterial tenecteplase with thrombectomy; challenges low-certainty evidence for benefit in large-vessel occlusion stroke.
Intra-arterial tenecteplase during endovascular treatment (EVT) may increase first-pass recanalization and dissolve microcirculatory thrombi, but its efficacy and safety are uncertain. We hypothesised that this strategy would improve functional outcomes versus EVT alone. This phase 3, randomised, adaptive-enrichment, open-label, blinded-endpoint multicentre study aims to evaluate whether intra‑arterial tenecteplase improves clinical outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Patients with large‑vessel occlusion eligible for EVT within 24 hours of symptom onset were randomly assigned (1:1) to the tenecteplase group receiving intra‑arterial tenecteplase during EVT or the control group receiving EVT alone. The primary endpoint was favorable functional outcome. Of 380 randomised patients (192 in the tenecteplase group and 188 in the control group), primary outcome data were available for 190 and 186 patients, respectively. Favorable 90-day functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) occurred in 40.0% of the tenecteplase group versus 46.8% of the control group (unadjusted odds ratio 0.76, [95% CI 0.50–1.14], P = 0.19). This work suggests intra-arterial tenecteplase during thrombectomy did not improve 90-day functional outcomes in this population. (Funded by National Science and Technology Major Project and hospital-initiated grants; ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05657444) It is unclear whether adjunct intra-arterial Tenecteplase during thrombectomy improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute large vessel occlusion. Here, the authors show that adjunct intra-arterial tenecteplase during thrombectomy does not improve 90-day functional outcomes in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (n=380). Intra-arterial tenecteplase during endovascular thrombectomy vs. Endovascular thrombectomy alone was evaluated on Favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) at 90 days (OR 0.759, 95% CI 0.504-1.142, p=0.185). Intra-arterial tenecteplase during thrombectomy did not improve 90-day favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2) compared to thrombectomy alone (40.0% vs 46.8%; OR 0.759, 95% CI 0.504-1.142, P=0.185).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: