Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conversation is a core component of human social life. Many influential theories treat conversation as a linear system, i.e., the sum of its parts. However, linear accounts of semantic entrainment lose explanatory power at their upper limits: discussing perfectly aligned opinions becomes boring. We propose an alternate account that treats conversation as a complex dynamical system. In such systems, pink noise is a hallmark of successful mutual adaptation. Here, we test whether pink noise can be found in interlocutors’ co-navigated trajectories through semantic space. Not only is pink noise present, but its strength predicts positive conversation outcomes, increases with practice, and is reflected in a large language model’s representation of conversation quality. These results demonstrate an important role for mutual adaptation in promoting successful conversation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Nell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: