Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Molecular and reaction fingerprints are widely used as static descriptors, but their relationship to graph-level reaction application remains unclear. We address this question in counted Extended-Connectivity Fingerprint (ECFP) space, representing reactions as signed differences between product and substrate fingerprints. We define ECFP-compatible templates, for which graph-level reaction application induces a constant fingerprint displacement, yielding a functorial mapping from graph transformations to affine translations in fingerprint space. We also introduce reaction-center ECFPs to encode the local environments required for template application and to provide a fast coordinate-wise prefilter for graph-level reaction applicability. We evaluate this framework on USPTO-50k and MetaNetX reactions across a range of ECFP radii. Both representations carry predictive information for reaction-class and enzyme-class classification, with reaction-center ECFPs contributing information not captured by reaction ECFPs alone. This framework connects reaction templates and reaction fingerprints to molecular pathway search and reaction-property prediction in fingerprint space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: