Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Substation civil engineering preliminary design documents must integrate project-specific conditions, current regulatory requirements, typical design practices, and historical engineering experience while maintaining consistency across architectural, structural, general-layout, foundation, road, drainage, and technical-indicator sections. Conventional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems remain vulnerable to condition-insensitive retrieval, unequal source authority, incompatible evidence, unsupported engineering claims, and parameter drift during long-document drafting. This study proposes an Evidence-Constrained Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework, termed EC-ARAG. The framework combines regulation-aware evidence representation, validity-gated hybrid retrieval, source-role-aware conflict resolution, dual planning--retrieval and generation--verification--repair loops, and global project-state memory. The experimental corpus comprised 36 national and industry standards, 12 enterprise standards, 18 typical-design documents, 64 historical preliminary design documents, and nine project-input documents. The held-out evaluation included 120 retrieval queries, 80 applicability cases, 48 evidence-conflict cases, 318 atomic design propositions, and five independent generation runs. EC-ARAG achieved a Recall@5 of 94.1\%, an applicability Macro-F1 of 90.6\%, an evidence support rate of 95.0\%, section completeness of 96.0\%, and cross-section parameter consistency of 97.0\%. Its unsafe-claim rate and character-level manual-edit rate were 3.4\% and 7.6\%, respectively. Although agentic verification increased machine inference time, total operational completion time was 21.4\% lower than that of closed-corpus Corrective RAG. Under the evaluated single-project, text-only conditions, EC-ARAG improved the reliability, traceability, and professional editability of regulation-intensive preliminary design drafting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: