Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical relations and planet formation simulations suggest an upper mass limit for rocky planets of ∼10 M ⊕ , as cores above this will almost certainly undergo runaway gas accretion. Nevertheless, a small number of planets appear to have densities consistent with rocky Earth-like compositions above this threshold, indicating that unusual formation and evolutionary scenarios are capable of producing extremely massive rocky planets. However, all of these planets orbit active stars with log R HK ′ > −4.75. We find a <1% probability that all literature ultramassive rocky planets would coincidentally orbit such active stars, and find no astrophysical reason to expect mega-Earths to preferentially form around active stars. We therefore conclude that mega-Earths are artifacts of stellar activity, and we question the reliability of Gaussian processes to enable mass measurements for rocky planets around active stars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brinkman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: