Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
= 0.385). Parental stress was negatively associated with coping strategies (β = -0.382, p < 0.001). Social support was positively associated with both coping strategies (β = 0.427, p < 0.001) and parenting self-efficacy (β = 0.452, p < 0.001). Coping strategies (β = -0.286, p < 0.001) and parenting self-efficacy (β = -0.358, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with child behavioral outcomes. The direct path from parental stress to parenting self-efficacy was non-significant (β = -0.089, p = 0.164). Mediation analyses indicated that coping strategies significantly mediated both the stress-outcome and support-outcome relationships, whereas self-efficacy mediated only the support-outcome pathway. Serial indirect effects through coping strategies and then self-efficacy were significant for parental stress (β = 0.043, 95% CI [0.008, 0.078]) and social support (β = -0.048, 95% CI [-0.085, -0.011]). Findings highlight targeted interventions to strengthen social support, adaptive coping, and parenting self-efficacy. Coping-skills training and confidence-building may benefit children with ASD. The study supports a serial mediation framework: coping and self-efficacy are key pathways from contextual factors to child outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: