Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
= 218) inferences decreases when the context of the decision is obscured, suggesting that domain-specific beliefs slightly improve metacognitive inferences above and beyond what can be inferred via statistical regularity monitoring alone. In Study 3, we replicate these findings and investigate differences in subjective experiences (e.g., motivation, effort) across conditions. Together, our findings suggest that privileged metacognitive cues do improve the accuracy of decision makers' metacognitive knowledge, but that observers can make reasonably accurate inferences about decision makers' choice behavior, particularly when they can combine statistical regularity monitoring with domain-specific beliefs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cash et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: