Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Plants allocate photosynthetically fixed carbon (C) between metabolic needs, biomass production (BP), and non-structural carbon (NSC), a buffer between carbon supply and demand. While conceptual representation of alternative regulatory mechanisms of NSC has advanced significantly in recent decades, quantitative assessments of NSC's contribution to the ecosystem C budget have not been possible. We estimated C flux to or from the NSC pool (F NSC ) as the difference between gross primary productivity (GPP), plant respiration (R p ), and BP in a shortleaf pine forest. Annual GPP remained relatively stable, but F NSC varied during the 3-year study period: 77-350 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹ in dry years (2022-2023) and 41 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹ in the wet year (2024), representing 2-18% of annual GPP. In contrast, C allocation to BP was ∼43% higher in the wet year. Flux-based F NSC (37 ± 84 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) closely matched F NSC estimates from monthly tissue NSC content (65 ± 77 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) during 2024 (Feb-Dec). F NSC was inversely related to BP, Biomass Production Efficiency, and plant water status. These findings are consistent with the surplus carbon hypothesis, which posits sink strength-driven C allocation, and can serve as the conceptual foundation for next-generation carbon allocation algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baniya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: