Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This scoping review examined how resilience theory can be applied in psychotherapeutic work with sexual and gender-diverse (SGD) clients, addressing a gap in both South African and international psychology literature. While SGD research has largely focused on adversity, stigma and minority stress, less attention has been given to strengths-based therapeutic approaches. Resilience is commonly conceptualised as a dynamic process arising from interactions between individuals and their social environments that enables adaptation in the face of adversity, offering a useful lens for affirmative and culturally competent psychotherapeutic practice. Following the Arksey and O’Malley framework and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, 11 databases, two search engines and reference lists were searched. Of 62 records identified, seven published between 2012 and 2024 met inclusion criteria. Inductive thematic analysis revealed four patterns: a shift from deficit-based to strengths-oriented approaches; a socio-ecological understanding of resilience across individual, family and community contexts; recognition of unconventional resilience strategies; and the central role of affirmative practice and cultural competence in resilience-informed therapy. Notably, no South African records were identified. The review highlights the need for local empirical research and for integrating resilience-informed, affirmative approaches into psychological training and practice to advance equitable and meaningful mental health care for SGD clients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motumi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: