Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dielectric elastomer actuator (DEA)-driven capsule robots convert periodic excitations into net translation through passive constraints, yet a systematic study on optimal constraint design remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we present a comparative numerical study of six passive constraint families that range from linear and bistable springs to limit stops and polynomial shapes and encompass 2447 configurations under a reference condition. The best configuration of each family spans more than an order of magnitude in speed, from 2.62 mm/s (linear spring) to 33.86 mm/s (asymmetric bistable). We find that the sign of the constraint-force derivative at the rest position separates every family with negative rest-position stiffness from every family with positive stiffness, whereas the second derivative (curvature) shows no correlation with speed. Building on this observation, we formulate a library-based inverse-design framework that treats velocity as a specification and minimizes the peak driving force. The comparisons reported here are made under one reference condition, and the ranking is therefore a property of the library as sampled rather than a general design rule. For example, relaxing the target velocity from 25 mm/s to 23 mm/s reduces the peak force from 0.31 N to 0.19 N. These results move passive-constraint design from empirical trial-and-error toward a requirement-driven methodology for future soft capsule robots.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: