Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Problem-solving is an essential competency in science learning. However, many students still demonstrate limited problem-solving ability due to insufficient opportunities to engage with contextual and authentic learning tasks. The purpose of this study was to analyze problem-solving skills among seventh-grade students during integrated Design Thinking with Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) learning on the water cycle topic. This research employed a descriptive quantitative method, involving 32 students from class VII-H at SMP Negeri 5 Malang, chosen using a total sampling technique. Data were gathered through an essay test designed according to Polya’s four problem-solving indicators: understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and reviewing the solution. The data collected in this study were processed using descriptive quantitative analysis techniques. The study found that 87.5% of students demonstrated a high level of problem-solving ability, while 12.5% were categorized as moderate. Among the four indicators Devising a Plan and Reviewing the Solution showed the highest achievement, while Understanding the Problem showed the lowest achievement. These findings indicate that integrated Design Thinking-STEAM learning provides a contextual, systematic, and student-centered learning context in which students can demonstrate problem-solving skills on the water cycle topic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wulandari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: