Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with a broad spectrum of clinical conditions. However, real-world data on EBV DNA testing patterns and positivity across clinical settings remain limited. We evaluated testing trends, clinical indications, EBV-DNA positivity rates, and viral load distribution across major clinical groups in a tertiary-care setting. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed EBV DNA testing data from 404 patients tested using whole blood at a tertiary-care center in North India between 2024 and 2025. Viral loads were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Testing indications, detection rates, and viral load distributions were evaluated across clinical subgroups. Statistical analysis: Categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, followed by the Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple comparisons of viral load data. Results: EBV DNA was detected in 25.50% of cases. The highest positivity rate (36.84%) was observed among patients with secondary immunodeficiency, all of whom were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive. Lymphoproliferative disorders constituted the largest referral group (26.48%), followed by renal transplant recipients (12.62%). Median viral loads were highest among HIV-positive patients (1.67 × 10 5 copies/mL) and renal transplant recipients (1.26 × 10 5 copies/mL). Conclusion: EBV-DNA testing was requested across diverse clinical settings, extending beyond traditionally recognized high-risk populations such as transplant recipients and patients with immunodeficiency. HIV-positive individuals showed the highest observed positivity rate and median viral load. These findings provide a real-world overview of EBV-DNA testing patterns and EBV DNAemia across diverse clinical populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: