Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrochemical performance in porous electrodes is governed by coupled transport and nonlinear reaction kinetics, yet spatial reaction heterogeneity is rarely condensed into a design-oriented quantitative metric. Here, a dimensionless Reaction Localization Number (RLN), defined as the peak-to-average magnitude of the Faradaic reaction-current distribution, is introduced for transport-limited porous silicon micro-battery electrodes. A physics-based continuum model first maps RLN across electrolyte ionic conductivity (κₑ) and diffusivity (Dₑ), showing that ionic conduction is the dominant control: RLN decreases from 8.77 to 1.52 as κₑ increases from 0.05 to 1.2 S m⁻¹, an 82.7% reduction, whereas Dₑ produces comparatively minor changes over the investigated range. Robustness is then tested using an expanded 54-case matrix spanning κₑ = 0.05–1.2 S m⁻¹, applied current density iapp = 35–105 A m⁻², and negative-electrode thickness Lneg = 125–375 µm. Across this matrix, RLN spans 1.12–13.35 and populates low (RLN < 3), moderate (3 ≤ RLN < 6), and high (RLN ≥ 6) localization regimes. At κₑ = 0.20 S m⁻¹ and iapp = 70 A m⁻², increasing Lneg from 125 to 250–375 µm drives RLN from 2.64 to 4.60–6.73, traversing all three regimes. Conversely, every tested current–thickness combination at κₑ ≥ 0.8 S m⁻¹ remains in the low-localization regime. The RLN = 3 and 6 boundaries are therefore interpreted as operational peak-amplification thresholds rather than universal constants. The results establish RLN as a compact descriptor linking transport demand, electrode geometry, and reaction heterogeneity for screening porous-electrode designs against localization risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faycal Znidi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: