Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shame is central to 1 Corinthians both as social context and rhetorical strategy, showing Paul’s deliberate use and inversion rather than elimination of Greco-Roman cultural values to form communal identity and conduct. The article identifies three embodied modes at work in the letter: shaming gestures, gestures of shame emotion, and gestures of shamelessness. Shaming gestures appear in the subjugation imagery of powers beneath Christ (15:24–28), which draws on Roman humiliation iconography to consolidate dominance through shame. Gestures of shame emotion emerge in the visitor’s gesture of prostration (14:24–25), aligning with regulatory responses to communal shaming. Gestures of shamelessness center on women’s head covering and hairstyle practices (11:2–16), interpreted either as defiance of prevailing norms or as modesty that marks a change of status within the community’s inverted values. Overall, Paul’s use of gestures of shame illustrates the inverted cultural value system while preserving the honor–shame framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarah Christiane Herzog (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: