Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Establishing a unified yet system-specific physicochemical framework for glass formation across covalent, ionic, and metallic systems remains a fundamental challenge, as existing models are largely confined to a single glass family or heavily biased toward compositions that have been successfully vitrified. Here we bridge this gap using a success-bias-free dataset of 78,889 compositional entries drawn from glass-forming region maps. Encoding each composition as an elemental-property matrix derived from the Magpie database, we train a scalable XGBoost framework that attains 89.6% classification accuracy on the all-glass dataset, and generalizes robustly to extrapolative elemental substitutions and higher-dimensional spaces. Shapley analysis of all-glass and system-specific models shows that the four glass families share the same set of frustration mechanisms whose relative weights redistribute systematically with bonding character. Across all families, governing descriptors exhibit a bounded, non-monotonic dependence that we term frustration inversion, whereby compositional heterogeneity stabilizes the amorphous state only up to a family-specific threshold that narrows as network rigidity decreases, furnishing quantitative bounds on the confusion principle. The analysis further identifies BCC-polymorph-referenced elemental descriptors as compositional-level predictors that encode structural preferences toward vitrification. These results establish a cross-system foundation for amorphous stability and a data-driven route to functional glass design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: