Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Triphenylphosphine sulfide ligand (L1) exhibited excellent catalytic performance in the copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) of ethynyldiphenylphosphine oxide (1) and azides (2), affording functionalized 4-phosphinyl-1,2,3-triazoles (3) in good yields. L1 showed superior performance to triphenylphosphine oxide, triphenylphosphine, and the sulfide ligands examined, possibly owing to suitable coordination of its P=S moiety to Cu. And, the products could be transformed to 4-phosphanyl-1,2,3-triazoles (4) and 1-benzyl-substituted 1,2,3-triazoles (5) by reduction and dephosphinylation, respectively. This [Cu]/L1-catalyzed protocol, the first example of the application of triphenylphosphine sulfide as a ligand in CuAAC, featured the following advantages: low catalyst loading, relatively short reaction time, broad functional group tolerance, high yields, and facile scalability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: