Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Marketing measurement calibration architecture We describe an architecture for calibrating marketing measurement from a brand’s own governed operating record, as an alternative to both multi-touch attribution (which depends on user-level tracking that is failing structurally, not just through cookie deprecation) and media-mix modelling calibrated by purchased incrementality experiments. The core proposal: every recommendation a marketing system issues can carry a pre-registered expected outcome; adoption and non-adoption of that recommendation can both be measured against it; and declared campaign targets can function as pre-registered treatment groups. Together these turn ordinary operation into a continuous source of causal evidence, at no marginal cost, without tracking individual users. This is an architecture paper, not an empirical one. It specifies the design and the evidence it would need to validate or falsify, states its own limits plainly (including a measured instance where the approach failed and why), and reports no results from a deployment. A companion empirical paper is intended to follow. The paper gives particular attention to markets — India foremost among them — where user-level journey reconstruction was never viable, due to messaging-led discovery, cash-on-delivery purchasing, and marketplace checkout, rather than only to recent privacy regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abhishek Mishra (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: