Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multimodal retinal imaging enables repeated, noninvasive assessment of vascular, neuroretinal, choroidal, perfusion, oxygenation, and flow-related phenotypes, positioning the retina as a platform for systemic microvascular phenotyping. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) provides an informative translational reference model because estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) offer standardized clinical anchors across disease severity and progression. This critical narrative review, informed by structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science, evaluates retinal phenotypes from biological association and longitudinal prediction to incremental clinical value, external validation, and implementation. Fundus photography, ultra-widefield imaging, optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCTA), and functional retinal imaging provide complementary information, but retinal signals are not organ-specific. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled models may support automated phenotyping and opportunistic risk enrichment, but credible translation requires appropriate comparators, external validation, calibration, subgroup assessment, decision-analytic utility, and workflow evaluation. Retinal imaging should therefore be viewed as an adjunctive platform rather than a stand-alone CKD diagnostic test, with its near-term role being to identify individuals warranting confirmatory kidney assessment when retinal images are already available and recent eGFR/UACR data are absent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: