Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study compared models minimizing body-size effects on knee extension and flexion peak torque in adolescent athletes. The sample included 102 athletes (66 males, 13.9 years; 36 females, 14.2 years). Peak torque was measured at 60°/s with an isokinetic dynamometer. Body mass (BM), height, lean soft tissue (LST), and dominant-leg appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST) were assessed. Normalization required nonsignificant associations with body size (p > .05) and low explained variance (R2 < 9%). Cross-validation and AICc analysis were subsequently performed. Standard ratios did not achieve effective normalization simultaneously in both sexes. Seven allometric models met both criteria in both sexes, comprising single-variable models using LST, ALST, or maturity-adjusted LST, and combinations of BM and height, LST and height, ALST and height, or maturity-adjusted LST and height. LST-based models performed most consistently and are recommended, while ALST-based models and BM–height combinations remain viable alternatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: