Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accelerating the circular economy transition requires policy arrangements that connect recurring resource-conversion activities, economic incentives, and credible verification across production systems. This study develops a systems policy framework for upcycling by linking consumption-tax incentives to verified circular material flows. Upcycling is conceptualized as a multi-actor material-conversion system integrating interdependent material, fiscal, and information-verification flows. The study combines qualitative comparative policy analysis and framework synthesis. Statutes, official policy documents, government guidance, and international-organization reports are analyzed by the policy functions they perform within the circular material-conversion system, including intervention stage, target activity, support basis, timing and refundability, and verification requirements. The analysis identifies a relative functional gap at the recurring acquisition-input-conversion stage: reviewed instruments commonly support specific products, transactions, capital investment, taxable income, or virgin-material disincentives, rather than verified and repeated resource conversion after commercialization. The proposed framework links incentives to verified acquisition, actual production input, and value-enhancing conversion. It establishes activity-based eligibility criteria and incorporates traceability requirements, safeguards against duplicate claims and excessive fiscal exposure, ex post verification, recapture, and periodic review. The resulting principles can be translated into VAT/GST-linked credits or refunds, separate business tax credits, environmental-tax mechanisms, and other fiscal architectures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: