Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Floods are among the most damaging hazards in Sri Lanka's wet-zone river basins, where short warning lead times constrain preparedness and physically based hydrodynamic models are often impractical under limited data. This study develops a lag-informed deep-learning framework for 10-h-ahead downstream water-level forecasting in the flood-prone Kalu Ganga Basin, Sri Lanka. Flood-wave travel times between Rathnapura, Ellagawa, Millakanda, and the downstream target station Putupaula were estimated from hourly records covering 2021–2024 using event-based peak matching, rising-limb timing, and cross-correlation. Selected travel times were 18 h for Rathnapura–Ellagawa, 23 h for Ellagawa–Putupaula, and 24 h for Millakanda–Putupaula. These lags were used to align upstream water-level inputs, while rainfall remained in its original chronological order. No-lag and lag-informed Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Bi-LSTM models were evaluated using chronological training, validation, and independent testing. Lag-informed inputs reduced Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) from 0.317 to 0.288 m for LSTM and from 0.339 to 0.286 m for GRU, while Bi-LSTM performance decreased. The lag-informed GRU also outperformed persistence and ARIMA baselines. Stage-aware training further improved high-flow prediction, with the GRU achieving an RMSE of 0.262 m, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.188 m, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.934, while the LSTM predicted the 5.57 m June 2024 flood peak at 5.44 m. The framework was deployed as a real-time decision-support dashboard named KaluHydroNet, demonstrating that lag-informed and stage-aware deep learning coupled with live data integration offers a practical pathway for short-term flood early warning in the Kalu Ganga Basin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Senavirathne et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: