Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives To evaluate the anti-plaque effect of a prophylactic paste containing Surface Pre-Reacted Glass-ionomer (S-PRG) fillers under cariogenic challenge using a randomized in situ model. Materials and methods This randomized, double-blind study involved 18 volunteers; both the participants and the outcome assessor were blinded to the prophylactic agent allocation. The prophylactic agents were the S-PRG-based Pro-Care Gel (Shofu Inc.; test), Herjos (Vigodent; conventional comparator), and pumice and water (negative control). The other factors were cariogenic challenge (presence or absence) and time of plaque accumulation (24 h and 7 days). During 8 days, volunteers wore intraoral appliances with enamel blocks divided into 2 rows (split-mouth design), in one of them a cariogenic challenge was applied (20% sucrose, 8x/day). Prophylaxis was performed at baseline and again after the 24-hour assessment. The three agent phases were separated by 7-day washout periods. Plaque accumulation was evaluated by quantitative digital image analysis of plaque-covered area (mm²) and adapted Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) scores. Results Three-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed significant main effects of Time, Cariogenic Challenge, and Prophylactic Agent (all p < 0.001). A significant Time × Prophylactic Agent interaction ( p = 0.022) indicated different temporal patterns among agents. Plaque accumulation increased from 24 h to 7 days in all groups, while Pro-Care Gel showed the lowest plaque-covered area at both evaluations; the OHI-S analysis showed the same overall group/time pattern. Conclusions Under the conditions of this short-term in situ study, the tested S-PRG-based prophylactic paste (Pro-Care Gel) resulted in lower stainable plaque accumulation than the tested conventional paste (Herjos) and pumice/water. These findings are specific to the products and outcomes evaluated. Clinical relevance S-PRG prophylactic paste exhibits a sustained anti-plaque effect, markedly reducing dental plaque accumulation relative to the two comparators during the 7-day evaluation period. This strategy could particularly be effective for high-caries-risk patients, as the material’s efficacy is not compromised by frequent sucrose exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gentile et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: