Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Confidence (certainty/uncertainty about one's own decision) has attracted considerable attention in psychology, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. Yet its relation to behavior remains unclear: Some treat confidence as a cause of behavior whereas others view it as a state controlled by environmental variables. The unobservable nature of confidence makes its measurement validation and analyses difficult. To tackle these issues, we developed a novel procedure combining a decision-making task, risk choices, and a post-task open-ended questionnaire. Point-gain/loss amounts for correct/incorrect decisions varied depending on choices between high-risk/high-return and low-risk/low-return. In the questionnaire, 90% of 16 participants reported feelings interpretable as certainty/uncertainty when making those risk choices despite no instruction about confidence, whereas 8% did so when the choices led to identical outcomes/returns. This suggests confidence is a state controlled by environmental contingencies rather than a cause of behavior. We also decoded changes in the state from electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsutsumi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: