How we ask matters: comparing categorical and open-ended sexual orientation self-definitions among LGBQ+ Lithuanians

This article examines the differences that emerged when 175 LGBQ+ Lithuanians were asked to define their sexual orientation in an open-ended format, followed by self-labeling from a list of nine categories. The results revealed that most LGBQ+ individuals use consistent self-labels across both formats; however, approximately one third provided more nuanced descriptions of their sexual orientation in the open-ended responses. Such nuanced descriptions were more common among younger participants and those reporting lower levels of internalized heterosexism. No differences were observed between groups based on education, place of origin, or romantic partnership status. The implications of using categorical and open-ended approaches for the identity aspect of sexual orientation are discussed.