Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Nurse-led telephone triage, frequently guided by the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing Society (UKONS) tool, is a cornerstone of supportive oncology care, yet the appropriateness of triage decisions varies across settings. Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in medical communication but remain unvalidated for autonomous clinical decision-making, particularly in gynecologic oncology, where remote and telephone-based care pose distinct challenges. Methods and Materials: Twenty fictitious case vignettes representing common treatment-related toxicities in gynecologic oncology were developed. Three board-certified gynecologic consultants independently assigned UKONS Red–Amber–Green (RAG) triage categories, reaching unanimous consensus that served as the reference standard. Vignettes were submitted verbatim, as single-turn queries with no follow-up prompting, to three publicly available LLMs (OpenEvidence, ChatGPT, Google Gemini). LLM responses were mapped to RAG categories and compared descriptively against the reference standard, stratified by treatment type and platform. Results: All three LLMs achieved 100% concordance with the reference standard for all Red cases across both treatment groups, with no high-acuity case downgraded to self-care. Discrepancies clustered at lower-acuity boundaries. In the chemotherapy-alone group, errors were limited to omission of an explicit 24-h follow-up window for 1 Amber-rated complaints. In the combined group, all LLMs over-triaged intermediate-risk complaints toward immediate or same-day evaluation; low-risk complaints showed more variable over-triage. Conclusions: LLMs identified unambiguous emergent gynecologic oncology symptoms, preserving the UKONS safety floor, but showed relatively reduced precision and a conservative over-triage bias at lower-acuity margins, especially in the combined-therapy collective. These findings support a supervised, adjunctive role for LLMs, rather than autonomous deployment, pending prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Psilopatis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: