Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The biomechanical implications of coronal-plane alignment following paediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remain unclear. Five adolescents underwent gait analysis, magnetic resonance imaging, and electromyography-informed neuromusculoskeletal finite-element modelling 12 months post-ACLR. Subject-specific models incorporating measured hip–knee–ankle angle were compared with neutral alignment simulations under identical gait inputs. Coronal-plane alignment produced participant-specific differences in tibial cartilage stress magnitude, with stress patterns preserved (r ≥ 0.90). Tibiofemoral kinematics remained unchanged, without consistent relationships between alignment and medial–lateral stress distribution. These exploratory findings suggest limited biomechanical influence of coronal-plane alignment under prescribed gait conditions, warranting further investigation in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seeto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: