Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced multilingual NLP significantly, yet their effectiveness for Bengali, a globally important but low-resource language, remains understudied due to limited linguistic resources and the absence of a standardized evaluation benchmark. This is due to the unavailability of large linguistic resources and the lack of a standard benchmarking framework, which has yet to be established. This study aims to address the underrepresentation of Bengali text classification by leading a systematic evaluation. It involves assessing multiple open-weight LLMs on Bengali text classification tasks and observing their limitations and regular error patterns. The procedure consists of six open-weight LLMs, which include LLaMA-3.2-3B, Mistral-V3-7B, DeepSeek-R1-8B, Phi-4-14B, Gemma-2-27B, and Qwen-2.5-72B, and are evaluated using four critical text classification tasks in Bengali, namely sentiment analysis, emotion recognition, hate-speech detection, and fake-news classification. Furthermore, two prompting methods are compared in the context of zero-shot and few-shot prompting using both the vLLM inference engine and Hugging Face Transformers pipelines to investigate the adaptability of the models in resource-limited settings. Across all four tasks, the two largest models (Qwen-2.5-72B and Gemma-2-27B) obtained the highest scores, although the ranking was not strictly monotonic in parameter count and, because each scale is represented by a single model family, the design cannot attribute these differences to model size alone. When training in zero-shot, Qwen-2.5-72B showed the best performance at 79.90% accuracy and 79.88% Macro-F1 score, showing amazing accuracy on hate-speech detection. In the case of fake news, Gemma-2-27B performed best at 84.45% accuracy and 84.33% Macro-F1 score. With a few-shot set-up, Gemma-2-27B and Qwen-2.5-72B demonstrated a high level of performance in terms of Macro-F1 score, reaching 84.17% for fake-news detection and 66.80% for emotion recognition, respectively. Paired multi-model tests (Cochran’s Q with Holm-corrected McNemar post-hoc comparisons) confirmed significant differences among the six models across all tasks and prompting settings, whereas the effect of five-shot prompting, obtained with a single fixed demonstration set, was significant for only 4 of 24 model–task combinations after correction and never for the three largest models. The findings characterise benchmark classification performance under the evaluated settings rather than real-world effectiveness, and indicate that model scale, multilingual pre-training, and in-context demonstrations are jointly associated with, but cannot be causally isolated as drivers of, performance on Bengali text classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: