Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aims to analyze the customary non-litigation mechanism for land conflict resolution and examine the role of Hengad’do (nose-kissing) as a symbol of peace ratification in Raemude Village, West Sabu District, Sabu Raijua Regency. The study employs Karl Marx’s structural conflict theory and Victor Turner’s theory of ritual and symbols as theoretical frameworks, using a descriptive qualitative approach to understand customary conflict resolution practices. Data were collected through interviews, direct observation, and documentation to obtain relevant information regarding the resolution process. The findings reveal that land conflicts are resolved through dialogue, meetings, and customary deliberations involving conflicting parties, village government representatives, customary leaders, community figures, and families to reach mutually accepted agreements. These customary mechanisms facilitate conflict resolution through collective discussion and consensus-building, while Hengad’do is performed after an agreement has been reached as a symbol of ratification, acceptance of peace, and the formal conclusion of conflict. This traditional practice also signifies the restoration of social relationships and reconciliation between previously conflicting parties. Therefore, customary conflict resolution mechanisms and Hengad’do represent distinct but complementary elements in establishing lasting peace and strengthening the social legitimacy of mutually agreed settlements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Djo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: