Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study systematically analyzes the fundamental institutional mismatch between industrial-era monopoly systems and AI-era super-incremental, inclusive productivity. It demonstrates that all contemporary civilizational crises originate not from technological limits but from rigid power and wealth distribution structures inherited from two centuries of industrial civilization. The research negates all superficial reform schemes including currency reshaping, tax adjustment, and partial AI regulation, proving that genuine civilizational renewal requires dual reconstruction: wealth distribution restructuring and de-personalized public governance of power. This paper establishes the only three logically complete paths for human civilization’s future transition: incremental computational power dividend universalization as a transitional scheme, public AI production ownership as the medium-to-long-term civilized paradigm, and forced chaotic restructuring as the worst passive historical outcome. The core conclusion reveals that the AI revolution ultimately subverts the industrial-era rules of production monopoly and class solidification. By freezing old stock privileges while fully socializing future incremental productivity gains, humanity can permanently terminate historical class cycles and achieve irreversible civilizational upgrading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
XiangKun Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: