Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines collateral residuary inheritance by comparing al-Sarakhsī’s discussion in Al-Mabsūṭ with the Compilation of Islamic Law and literature on Indonesian Supreme Court decisions. It uses doctrinal research combining conceptual and statutory analysis with a limited examination of judicial materials. The analysis distinguishes kinship-based entitlement, the interpretation of walad as including daughters, and the authors’ proposal to consider care and financial contributions. The cited classical passages do not establish actual economic support as a general condition of residuary entitlement. Judicial literature indicates that the interpretation of walad may affect the position of the deceased’s siblings, but does not demonstrate a general contribution-based rule. The article proposes a conditional and proportionate model for legislative debate, subject to a clear legal basis, protection of fixed shares, and defined evidentiary safeguards. Social contribution alone does not authorize the cancellation of an inheritance entitlement under existing law.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Padilah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: